Heidi Roizen

1. What be the strengths and weaknesses of Roizens network at the end of the case? Heidi Roizen has invested date and drive in surfaceing and sustaining kinds/networks in the computer industry, especially in the atomic number 14 Valley atomic number 18a, throughout her professional c beer. As she moves into her venture capita key out role, her networking efforts contribute the pursual strengths Includes executives including CEOs, thereby giving her the experience of acting with these vexation leaders.Since she has naturalised relationships with legion(predicate) and her credibility is proven, which is an important criterion for business leaders this is a tiny skill in her new role. Since she is non scarcely hale known in the internet industry but is excessively fountainhead respected, her joining Softbank provides positive feedback round the new group fashioning it an inviting luck for many. Her current role is different from her prior jobs in that it requires making go/no-go funding decisions about start-up companies rather than establish a network of contact to athletic supporter develop the business she was involved in.This natural difference in her role allow put strains on her vast network as swell as herself. Namely- Reject projects from her acquaintances. Even though she has been making accommodative efforts to reach out to those affected by these indecent decisions, there is a good possibility that some sight will let these decision impact their own(prenominal)/professional relationships with her. Since, she is actually set her relationships a lot I imagine such issues will minusly affect her at a personal level.This has the potential of having a negative impact on her credibility in the industry Trying to g everywheren her network will put constraints on her professional and/or personal life. As she mentions that she spends two hours per day sending out rejection notes, I conceptualise for her to be able to sustain t his she will need to put in extra hours at work or compromise the quality of work. effect internal conflict for herself by deviating from her philosophy of helping otherwises when it is a inversely beneficial situation for both, since in her current role she is feeling pressured to help multitude by referring them to the companies she is tied with. 2) What specific steps did Roizen take to develop her network? To entertain it? Heidi Roizen is a very well know business leader in the computer industry sector, especially in silicon Valley. During the course of her career she has create a vast network of connections. The elementary reason for her vast network can be attributed to her innate extroversive and high energy personality coupled with a desire to move and help multitude with high caliber and engaging personalities. In addition, she was also required to cultivate relationships to support the software company, T/Maker, which she co-founded in the primaeval phase of he r career.The primary objective was to market the companys product. Her strategies towards ontogeny relationships entangled Follow the what can I offer arise. In her interactions with population she planned carefully on how to help their projects/needs. During her sentence at Tandem, she had opportunity to work with the companys CEOs and through her approach she built relationships with the CEO. Her relationship benefited her professionally as he recommended her for the Stanford MBA program. Identify organizations and tidy sum that will help her initiatives and engage them through meaningful contributions in their activities.To enhance her company, T/Maker, Heidi networked with the press, the software enterprisers forums and the software publishers association. Through her contributions she has open up sustainable relationships, as is evident by the glowing reviews paid to her by business leaders such as Brian Gentile of eALITY Inc. Trust her judgments on the caliber of per son she associates with rather than their position in the organization. The paper gives instances where she built relationships with smart, interesting and good quality people who later convey senior executives in their companies. Relationships are built on a compounding of professional- well-disposed interactions. She is known to pass on regular parties at her house. She used these events not only to build her relationships but also provide networking opportunities to her guests. Heidi gives a lot of importance to her relationships and is consequently very conscientious in sustaining them. To maintain her network, she believes in theatrical role of the interaction rather than quantity. She leverages her relationships after much thought, for e. g. higher up in the organization her contact is, fewer times she would contact that individual for favor. charge on been consistent in the relationship. She emphasizes being consistent in her actions patch dealing with friends. Ensurin g there is reciprocity in the relationship i. e. , there is a balance between the times she is asking for help versus helping that item individual out. ? 3) How does your own network compare with Roizens? To what extent are the differences due to the political structure in the networks assist?To what extent are the differences due to the personal preferences and style? As I compare my social/professional network to Heidi Roizens, one of the biggest differences is the number of people we know-my LinkedIn contact list is at 100+ while I guess Heidis would be 500+ category. After going through this article I have realized the significance networking can have on ones profession and moving forward will like to The commonalities between our relationships include Quality of interactions rather than quantity.I have some very good friends whom I only meet once/twice per year yet the relationship has been sustained. Relationships have to be on an even footing. I make concerted efforts to ens ure reciprocity is maintained from my end. There have been occasions in the past where I have discontinued relationships when I felt the other individual was always asking for help. Some differences that occur in our relationships are Heidi is very social and has parties almost every weekend in her house. This is not the case at my place. There is a very strong vehemence in her life on networking, which is not the case for me. She seems to invest time in relationships with the flavour of leveraging them for future benefit either for herself or other acquaintances. This becomes clear at the end of the case during her time Softbank she referred people to organizations that will help her business interest. In my case, relationships can sometimes be used to exchange ideas or just have fun without the clothed of obtaining any benefit. I am generally not looking to submit people together for mutual benefit. She makes an effort of run into new people through attending trade shows, par ticipating in conference etc.In my role, I have opportunity to attend technical conferences but my primary intent there is to acquire knowledge rather than meet new people. In my opinion one of the biggest reasons for the differences is our personality type. She is an out-going, high energy person with a passion for meeting new people. This means that interacting and meeting new people provides her with fuel to get recharged in life. I am an introvert who enjoys meeting people but feel drained after these experiences and need only/close family time to recharge.In addition, differences between Heidi and me can also be attributed to our professions. Since she has mainly worked as entrepreneurs/business developer, my role is to develop manufacturing processes. I believe there is a fundamental difference between these roles, her job needs interacting with a large number of people whereas in my case knowledge about the processes is more important. ? 4) What suggestions would you give R oizen for adjusting and maintaining her network as she became more involved as an internet venture capitalist?I will give her the following suggestions She should not try to sustain every relationship that she has established over the years. She should create of priority list of people and maintain relationships with those who meet her radical requirement of being smart and good quality as well are value added in her new role. She has to juggle three critical roles family, work and network management. If she focuses too much on trying to maintain her network, there is a high probability that one or both of the others will suffer. She should focus on creating some relationships with people who are not in the same industry sector as her. This will be in sync with her outgoing personality and fulfill her need to interact with people while not creating expectations/pressures in her profession. In the paper, it is obvious that many of the proposals, including meeting requests, being su bmitted are from with her network. Since most of these are being jilted and even though she is being very professional in rejecting these, it should be expected that some of these rejections are not well received.The negative reactions emanating from these may create stress for her and hamper her professional and personal life. She should also representative the rejection letters to her subordinates as she seems to be spending too much time on them and this is taking away from her work time that may be detrimental for her career. Since, her current role is different from her past roles of being an entrepreneur/business developer there is limited need for keeping a very large network.