Emotion and Thu Interdependence

Sociology Marriages and Families Final Term Paper Due April 28, 2011 THU mutuality and Relationships Chapter Five When you visit back at your descents in the past and when you look at the way you were when you were in those familys, were you the same? Or did you see yourself reassign? When some integrity is in a relationship, I believe, they become distinguishable than who they rightfully are. Being in love has such a strong knead on the people, sometimes they get lost. I believe that the strength that an respective(prenominal) has, to not lose sight of himself or herself while in love, describes the mutuality of those partners.Interdependence has a push-down list of connection with relationships. Therapist John Crosby (text pg 112), duologue rough the different styles of relationships and how the idiosyncratics mutualness connects with that style. He distinguished three different eccentrics of relationships. First, the A-frame relationship is described as a relationshi p where the partners have in truth little independence but a strong identity by means of the relationship. The individuals in this type of relationship have too much mutualness, and if one grows out the early(a) one will end up falling.The back up style is the H-frame relationship. This is when the partners have little or no interdependence. The partners in this type of relationship arent emotionally connected with each former(a) and terminate stand by themselves. Lastly, the M-frame relationship. Crosby describes this relationship style as having the best interdependency. The partners some(prenominal) have individuality yet they bring that support and influence to the other partner. Lehmiller also dialog about interdependence and relationships.His article Secret quixotic Relationships talked about his research on how secrecy of a relationship endure be unwholesome and how that affects the interdependency of that individual. Lehmiller states that secrecy of a relationship s hows the individuals low self-esteem and it promotes health risks. I believe a secret relationship has the interdependency like the A-frame relationship that Crosby had talked about. The partners keep the relationship a secret however they piece of tailt seem to allow go of the relationship even though secrecy is a harmful health risk.I believe this happens because they rely on each other so much that they lose themselves individually so all they groundwork do is keep that relationship. Another author, Adams, the author of Characteristics of closeness in stripling romantic relationships, talks about his investigation and what he discovered was that interdependence was linked to the closeness of romantic relationships. He states that no matter what sexual activity you are, the interdependency of an individual is linked to their relationships.Although these three authors talk about interdependence and how it connects with relationships, their views are slightly different as well. Lehmiller describes that interdependency has a lot to do with the certain situation that the partners are in, such as secrecy. Adams talks about how interdependence is influenced by age, the individuals social lives, and many more. Lastly, Crosby focuses on how the interdependency influences the different styles of relationships. After reading and comparing the articles, it make me think about how I am influenced and how much I influence my partner when in a relationship.Personally, I liked reading how secrecy of a relationship can be harmful because it was something new. I have never imagined myself having to hide out a relationship yet still be together with that partner. It made me think about how relationships really affect peoples emotions and minds. I realized, after reading these articles, that I should be more independent and stronger for myself in the lead I start having a relationship. I dont call for to see myself depending on a relationship and losing my identity. Lo ve is so strong, that you can lose your individuality, yet people always want to be in love or be loved.