Shermine Narwani and Maysaloon Albadri Research Paper

Shermine Narwani and Maysaloon Albadri - Research Paper ExampleHowever, Maysaloon Albadri, a critic of Narwani, uses intelligence and the rhetoric appeal of pathos to discredit her assertions. In this article, I will illustrate the manner in which Maysaloon and Narwani have applied logos, pathos, and rhetoric appeal to make their claims appealing to the audience.Maysaloon begins his essay by analyzing the nature of Narwanis article. He points out that any well-written and relatively neutral article that raises the slightest doubts that Assads regime is killing its muckle should non be taken seriously. He explains that Narwanis article, which talks about the regime killing its people, is distributed deadly and cited as future proof that Syria subjected to conspiracy (Maysaloon 2). The point that he is trying to put across is that the concomitant that a piece is well-written does not mean it holds the truth. Essentially, Maysaloon uses this kind of argument, which is based on cred ible evidence, to invalidate the assertions of Narwani in a way that really appeals to the readers. This is a perfect application of logos, which increase authenticity of the authors claims. Ideally, the reader would identify with this kind of logic, which is very appealing and convincing. Maysaloon increases the appeal of his argument by logically analyzing the happenings in the Arab League, in a way that disputes Narwanis main theme. Narwani explains that there are armed groups fighting the regime, which were not menti unrivaledd in the protocol. Maysaloon acknowledged this as a fact, but uses pathos to create a false perceive of pity for Narwanis tendency to create fabrications of the issues regarding the international media. This aspect is brought out clearly when he says It is rummy that Miss Narwani seems to think that the conventional narrative does not mention an armed element to Syrias uprising, when it does (Maysaloon 5). Here, Maysaloon uses the explicate curious to cr eate the illusion that he would not expect a person of the class of Narwani to cerebrate in such a manner, and could not identify why she misunderstood traditional narrative. This word is use to create a condescending tone and pathos, which is a clever way improving the appeal of ones ideas. Ideally, the pathos and logos are used to portray Narwani as incapable of writing apprised articles for media publication. The use of logos throughout the article, therefore, makes the readers want to know more about what Maysaloon is discussing, and identifies with Narwanis assertions as lacking credence. In her article, Foolishly ignoring the Arabs League report on Syria (Narwani 1), Narwani says that the international media completely ignores the armed entities that are likewise fighting against the regime, a fact that Maysaloon disputes strongly by use of logos. As a result, the audience is comfortably convinced that Narwani claims are misinformed. To support his divergent views, Maysal oon says that the conventional narrative that Narwani refers to exist only in the drumhead of most ardent supporters of Assad. He adds that the media has, in fact, made many reports about groups such as the barren Syrian army and other local groups that are attempting to protect themselves from the regime (Maysaloon 5). Maysaloon further discredits Narwani through a simple observation that she never cites any reference or source regarding the claim that there is a media conspiracy, which undermines or degrades the Arab League mission. Maysaloon is also using logos through reasoning and logic, in order to ordinance out the farces, and hence, seek the truth. Narwanis notion regarding conspiracy has no foundation and,