Inside Gates versus Out of Gates :: science

Inside Gates versus Out of Gates jokester as an III World Society shows rapid urbanization puzzle out without industrialization which causes some problems in housing situation. In postwar occlusion USA gave martial aid to Turkey, in order to bid to europium agricultural needs, so there appears job little villagers and sh atomic number 18croppers because of changes in agricultural area in terms of providing surplus by tractors namely by less human labor. So migration to big cities was emerged which is the reason for squatter settlements existence. On the other hand globalization fits a role in suburban learning which is the upper-class deals choice for leaving heterogeneous surroundings in city centers that causes to emerge new suburban homogeneous settlements as gated communities.Firstly, formation of squatter settlements implies temporariness and the term gecekondu refer building in unitary night. People build their gecekondus with having rising expectations for their fut ure because they dont let pessimistic feelings although they live in slums in the lack of even electricity. Gecekondu people are negatively labeled (stigmatized) as peasants in the city, uneducated, uncivilized, uncultured, backwards. They are as well as called as varo, which is a sign of subordination and exclusion of these kinds of people. (Kiziltan, 2004) They bring home the bacon in urban life by the help of democratic parties because they pack high voting potential, which is populism as a political aspect, and also they provide cheap labor as their second survival factor in economic dimension. Gecekondu amnesty/pardoning become possible as gecekondu people play a role in production-having cheap labor potential and also in consumption by buying products which urban people use, in order to show that they can adapt to the urban life. According to great deal Society Theory, when individuals hardly connect to society they become members of neighborly movements and propagate a gainst system. Besides this theory, second generation migrants are relatively deprived and drain to adapt in urban life so they display root word politic actions, try to challenge status quo, mobilize against advantaged groups. At the pedigree squatters have only use think of but after this value begin to turn into exchange value, so gecekondu people start to be stigmatized as undeserved rich, the villagers want to migrate to city to arrive at from this exchanged value and other urban life social institutions(health services, gentilityetc) so there exits social mobility towards cities. Also, there is another factor which causes social mobility in squatters squatters are heterogeneous environments which consist of people from different geographical background, so it is possible to expect high social mobility in these settlements.